Our Children Are The Guarantors

Defending Zionism from its detractors. Anti-Zionism is a form of anti-Semitism. Let the other side apologize for a change.

Wednesday, August 16, 2006

First As A Tragedy, Second As A Fark

Offensive:

Picture: passport photo of a five-year-old girl, showing her bare shoulders
Passport of a five-year-old girl showing her bare shoulders. From Dhimmi Watch.

Not offensive:

Picture: "Palestinians" stomping on their recently executed fellow countrymen
“Palestinians” stomping on the bodies of people executed publicly for alleged collaboration with the enemy, after no trial. From Riehl World View.

Yes, they’re just like us. They can be reasoned with, and their hearts and minds can be won over by doing a Czechoslovakia. There will be no more beheadings in Thailand once they’re given a chance for full self-determination. Of course.

So, the bare shoulders of a five-year-old girl are offensive to Muslims, and they must not be shown on a passport picture when traveling to an Islamic country (like Southern France—thanks for the confirmation). And don’t forget to give them holidays of their own (hat tip: LGF) in a Christian host country as protection against further bus and plane bombing plots. Anyone know the Arabic for “chutzpah”?

The question that still lies open is why people feel the need to cover up a five-year-old girl. In Western society (at least until Leftist perpetrator-sympathy-cum-victim-blaming gains total control), people who feel a sexual attraction to little girls aren’t viewed as normal, and if they act upon it they get in the slammer. In Islamic society, however, the noble idea that women shouldn’t be valued for their bodies alone is enforced with such draconian measures, namely the covering of almost the entire female body, that anyone who’s spent a few years there would, like a prisoner, seek to satisfy his sexual cravings on anything—even a five-year-old girl.

And there’s also an historico-religious reason that might have something to do with it: old Mo’s marriage to a little girl. Whatever the prophet of Islam does, Muslims take it as making it lawful (the Law of the Holy Gourd, obeyed by about a billion people who are all different).

I did fauxtography a few posts ago and it didn’t go very well. I decided now to try my hand at farkery instead. You be the judge how I am at that.

Picture: Prophet Clinton saying, "I did not have sexual relations with that girl, Aishah."
Prophet Clinton testifying in a hearing. Farked from original by Wondermark, via thread on Fark.

Labels:

2 Comments:

Anonymous religion of pieces said...

We all know that Mo married Aisha when she was six, spent a couple of years 'thighing' her ("Sit on my lap sweetheart and let's talk about the first thing that comes up") and then gave her a big surprise for her ninth birthday present.

But apparently even a six-year-old was a bit too mature for the Old Pervert. When he tired of Aisha, according to http://www.islamreview.com/articles/sexinislam.htm , he tranferred his lusts to a baby girl too young to walk.

"In the Sirat Rasul, we read the incredible story that Muhammad, himself, wanted to marry a crawling baby girl a few years before his death"
And yet in their the Incestuously Induced Islamic Insanity, the idiotically inbred cousin-fu****s believe that Mohammed is Allah's example of the Perfect Man.
Makes you wonder who the HELL is Allah?

August 18, 2006 1:23 AM  
Blogger ZionistYoungster said...

A dysfunctional religion, rendering dysfunctional even converts to it, not just those who were born into it, and every country where it's the law a F***edupistan.

August 18, 2006 1:04 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home